Friday, May 20, 2011
Rough Footage
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Answer To Engine Syncing Questions
Nearly unanimously the first question out of anyone after their eyes refocused when they heard about our double engine Corolla/MR2 project: “How will you synch the engines?” I heard this question so often, from the mechanical genius and inept alike, that I started to question whether the project was feasible. When I explained our theory, that synching would not be necessary since the systems would be completely independent like two coupled locomotives, they usually said “I guess that might work” with their mouth, and “you’re a batshit-crazy moron” with their facial expression.
A few would pursue the subject a little further and explain how if the engines were not synched they would contend with each other and drive the wheels at different speeds and chew up tires and put undue torque on drivetrain components and blah blah blah. As near as I could tell they expected our car to suffer the same problems manifest in a 4 wheel drive vehicle, with locked differentials front, rear, and center, doing 15’ radius turns on pavement.
My answer would be that any car has an endless array of forces operating for and against drive train: Going up hills, going down hills, head winds, tail winds cross winds, various load mass, collisions... Being welded to another car moving the same direction is just another external force on the first drive train. As far as one engine can tell, the combination of forward forces is no different than driving downhill.
My favorite is the people who speak with the authority of someone who just the other day was driving their own twin engine car and the axles snapped off on their way to work.
An endurance race proven example has been built and demonstrated. It works great. It ran hard all day. I personally flogged it. Not even an unexpected level of tire wear. If you want to build one that doesn't work just to prove us wrong, go nuts.
Answer To Transmissions Questions
Transmissions: The automatic/manual combination worked even better than we hoped. There was no contention, no heavy clunk shifts in the automatic, no problems. It was as simple as put the rear in “D” and drive normally
We had originally planned to use an electronically controlled transmission and shift the automatic with an electronic dial mounted on top of the manual shifter. Short story is we found a fully mechanical automatic and went with it due to crunch time.
The only adjustment we could make on this transmission was a cable that links to the throttle cable, the “kick-down” that tells the transmission that you are romping on the gas pedal. Initial tests we left this alone and it shifted at pretty lackadaisically. All we had to do was clamp the kick-down cable out a couple centimeters (pictured below) and our automatic was suddenly a hill climber, shifting somewhere around 5-6k rpm.
I was worried that when we released the throttle pedal (which was linked to both engines’ throttle cables, pictured below) to shift the manual, the automatic would disengage and hunt for the correct gear once we hit the gas again. Not a problem. I suspect because it only senses axle rotation, it was always ready to push just where it left off as soon as our manual shift was complete and we got back on the throttle.
Functionally the auto/manual combo was GREAT! Once you put it in drive you just drove the manual normally. Any place on the track where there was a gear selection question, you were fine with the higher manual gear because the auto was still pushing at the higher RPM. This was very distinct on the hill and in the lower speed corners.
The only problem was minor. The rear “muffler” was extremely loud compared to the front. It drown out the sound of the manual transmission engine. We had to keep a careful eye on the front tachometer for manual shifting. Shifting by sound is pretty instinctive and this took a few laps to get used to. Paul wired in and RPM shift light, but it didn’t work right and it wasn’t a critical problem. Fortunately nobody botched shifting too bad because one engine would be more than happy to push the other way past redline.
At Last!
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
V-RAM's current compression as the ass-half engine of the MRolla, 5-2011:
One of those is probably in revers order, but either way I'm encouraged by the cylinder that improved at least 10 PSI from th 2009 measurement, and I'm confident the others will all soon start increasing too.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Crunch Time
No more exterior pics until after we reveal the theme at the race this week. We had the whole team painting Saturday and the MRolla is looking good. Paul it the Bondo-Meister and his work has really transformed this shanty into a car.